WebPeople v Norfleet, 317 Mich App 649, 654; 897 NW2d 195 (2016). “Accordingly, trial courts imposing one of more discretionary consecutive sentences are required to articulate on the record the reasons for each consecutive sentence imposed.” WebJan 7, 2024 · Sam Bernstein of ArborYpsi Law is an assertive Michigan criminal defense lawyer who is well-versed in what it takes to achieve a favorable outcome, and if you hire him, he will work tirelessly on your behalf. You can reach Mr. Bernstein through the form online or by calling (734) 883-9584 to set up a consultation. Comments are closed.
Michigan Legislature - Section 791.234
WebDefendant raises several issues relating to the trial court’s decision to order his sentence for using a computer to commit a crime to be served consecutive to both his CSC-I sentence and his federal sentences. A trial court’s decisions regarding discretionary consecutive sentencing People v Norfleet, 317Mich. App.649 , 664; 897 NW2d WebApr 7, 2024 · Gilbert, on parole for a state conviction, was arrested for printing false identifications and credit cards and was returned to the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections. Federal authorities charged Gilbert with identity theft crimes. Wolf was Gilbert's appointed counsel. Gilbert consented to federal detention pending trial. Gilbert … do all olympus lenses fit all olympus cameras
Michigan Legislature - Section 769.12
WebWith respect to whether consecutive sentencing was proper in this case, “[i]n Michigan, concurrent sentencing is the norm, and a consecutive sentence may be imposed only if specifically authorized by statute.” People v Ryan, 295 Mich App 388, 401; 819 NW2d 55 (2012) (citation and quotation marks omitted). WebMar 1, 2024 · The Michigan Legislature Website is a free service of the Legislative Internet Technology Team in cooperation with the Michigan Legislative Council, the Michigan House of Representatives, and the Michigan Senate. Go To Top Michigan Legislature Michigan Compiled Laws Complete Through PA 8 of 2024 WebThe trial court’s decision to impose discretionary consecutive sentences is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. People v Norfleet, 317 Mich App 649, 664; 897 NW2d 195 (2016). “Review of a discretionary decision requires that the trial court set forth the reasons underlying its decision.” Id. “The decision regarding each consecutive ... do all one touch meters use the same strips